To do so, organizations must adopt a mature SCA security model that includes prioritization and remediation on top of detection so developers and security professionals can focus on what really matters. SCA solutions are now bridging the gap between detection and remediation. A mature software composition analysis tool should include technologies that prioritize open source vulnerabilities.
By automatically identifying the security vulnerabilities that present the biggest risk, organizations are able to address these priorities first. After prioritization comes remediation. Remediating vulnerabilities automatically goes beyond just showing developers where the vulnerability is located to actually suggesting a fix and providing data on how likely the fix will impact a build.
Automated remediation workflows can be initiated based on security vulnerability policies triggered by vulnerability detection, vulnerability severity, CVSS score, or when a new version is released. One of the most reliable risk mitigation strategies is to keep your open source components continuously patched to avoid being exposed to known vulnerabilities.
A good SCA solution helps you achieve this. Advanced SCA tools — including repo, browser, and IDE integrations — seamlessly integrate into the software development life cycle SDLC to resolve vulnerabilities early when they are easier and cheaper to fix.
The database is the heart of any SCA solution. The more comprehensive the database , aggregating data from multiple sources, the better it is at identifying open source components and security vulnerabilities. Without a comprehensive, continuously updated database, you would be unable to detect the right versions of open source components to update licenses, remediate security vulnerabilities, and apply updates and patches. The open source community is highly decentralized.
Because there is no one centralized source of information on updates or patches, you rely on the database for everything. An SCA solution should support not only the languages you are currently using but any language you might be considering using within the next year or two.
Plan ahead, and choose a solution with broad language support. From inventory, licensing, attribution, and due diligence reports to vulnerabilities and high severity bug reports, you need a solution that offers a wide range of reporting tools tailored to every use case, including management, legal, security, DevOps and DevSecOps. Policies that automate the process of open source selection, approval, tracking, and remediation save developers time and greatly increase their accuracy.
As discussed earlier, you need a solution that prioritizes security vulnerabilities and offers remediation advice. The more you automate, the easier it will be to resolve the most critical issues first without slowing down development. SCA solutions fall into two broad categories:. Developer tools help developers avoid vulnerable open source components before a pull is made and fix any vulnerabilities detected in their code via tools integrated with native development environments.
The best SCA solutions offer both governance and developer tools. This guarantees that everyone gets the tools they need, when and where they need them. Choose an SCA solution that integrates seamlessly with a wide range of developer environments at every stage of the SDLC — repositories, build tools, package managers, and CI servers — so developers can decide whether they can or should use an open source component before a pull request is made.
Container and Kubernetes use is widespread, yet security remains a challenge. Select an SCA solution that scans open source components from inside your containerized environments, identifying vulnerabilities or compliance issues and automatically enforcing policies. Also make sure the solution has native support for your specific container registry.
Open source components have become the main building block in software applications across all verticals. Yet despite the heavy reliance on open source, too many organizations are lax about ensuring that their open source components meet basic security standards and are compliant with licensing requirements.
Julie Peterson. Free Trial Log In. Contents hide. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Ask Question. Asked 6 years, 10 months ago. Active 6 years, 10 months ago. Viewed times.
Is the former meant as a replacement for the latter in most circumstances? I think I have a problem that would benefit from the ZCA. What are the usual features of a problem that make the ZCA the correct answer? Supplementary Information: Familiarity with Zope Constructs I have read through the Comprehensive Guide to Zope Component Architecture , but I'm left with a feeling similar to when I learned my first programming language: I know the names of things and what they do, but I don't understand how to orchestrate all the various pieces into a useful thing.
Familiarity with Software Component Architecture I only have a very superficial understanding of SCA, most of which stems from the Wikipedia articles on SCA and Service Oriented Architecture, along with this article from my distant past life as an indie game developer.
A Solution in Search of Problem? Again, I'm unable to: generalise from the examples provided in the documentation imagine the high-level structure and organisation of a ZCA code base. Improve this question. Community Bot 1. Louis Thibault Louis Thibault 2, 3 3 gold badges 14 14 silver badges 17 17 bronze badges.
I've never used the term SCA in context of the ZCA; a quick glance at the WP description tells me SCA is far higher level and includes support for the components to be implemented in different languages.
MartijnPieters, this surprises me. ZCA seems to have a notion of "services" in the SCA sense and is all about making highly-independent things talk to each other through strictly-defined interfaces. Is there a "Zope paradigm" of any sort? Could you address questions 3 and 4? MartijnPieters, I would also like to point out that the official Zope site seems to endorse "component architecture" wiki. There are several such patterns. See Component-Based Software Development for a description of some of them.
See also MEF. All that's really required is an Interface and registration mechanism. Plone viewlets as multi-adapters really made it click for me.
0コメント